Use of Stroke Alert Sticker in the Field Decreases Time to Acute Interventions for Ischemic Stroke Patients.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Stroke is a medical emergency requiring timely intervention to optimize patient outcomes. The only treatments currently Food and Drug Administration approved for acute stroke are intravenous (IV) thrombolytics, which require obtaining specific medical history to be administered safely. This medical history may be overlooked in the prehospital setting or lost during patient handoff between emergency medical services (EMS) personnel and hospital staff, delaying treatment. We evaluated whether utilization of a "stroke alert sticker" by EMS to capture key information in the field would decrease door-to-needle (DTN) time. METHODS: Bright-orange "stroke alert stickers" were disseminated to our local EMS agency to be placed on all suspected stroke patients in the field prompting documentation of key elements needed for timely treatment decisions. The "stroke alert sticker" included time last known well, contact information, presenting symptoms, and relevant medications. We evaluated the impact of the "stroke alert sticker" on acute stroke metrics, including DTN time. RESULTS: The project included 220 consecutive stroke alert patients brought to our comprehensive stroke center by a single EMS agency from May 2021 through February 2022. Twenty-one patients were treated with an IV thrombolytic. Overall "stroke alert sticker" use compliance was 40%; for the subgroup of patients who were given an IV thrombolytic, the "stroke alert sticker" was used 60% of the time. In patients who received an IV thrombolytic, prehospital EMS notification was 100% with "stroke alert sticker" use, compared with 75% without (P = .13). In addition, with "stroke alert sticker" utilization, DTN time was reduced by 20 minutes (31 [11] minutes with sticker vs 51 [21] minutes without, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Utilization of the "stroke alert sticker" significantly improved DTN times compared with patients without the sticker. This evidence supports continued use of the "stroke alert sticker" to improve DTN times and patient outcomes.

Applying the Care and Communication Bundle to Promote Palliative Care in a Neuro-Intensive Care Unit: Why and How.

Background: Delivery of palliative care in neurointensive care units (neuro-ICUs) can be inconsistent, often due to absence of formal care triggers. The Care and Communication Bundle (CCB) of Quality Indicators provides a standardized process to deliver effective palliative care services in ICUs, but application of these indicators in this setting has not yet been systemically assessed. Objectives: To evaluate the fit of a CCB in the neuro-ICU through a novel scoring system and identify barriers to adherence. Design: CCB standards for a neuro-ICU were delineated. Assessment of documented indicators and barriers was conducted through electronic medical record retrospective review. Setting/Subjects: A 30-bed neuro-ICU in a large Academic Medical Center in the Southeastern United States. Chart reviews were conducted for 133 critically ill neurology and neurosurgery patients who expired between November 2018 and January 2020. Results: Results demonstrate moderate adherence to CCB standards, including excellent consistency in establishment of patient-centered communication and referral to supportive services (e.g., social work, spiritual support). Identified areas for improvement include documentation of patient and family involvement in care process (i.e., advance directive completion, interdisciplinary team meetings). Conclusions: Application of the CCB in the neuro-ICU is useful for examining adherence to time-based triggers of palliative care standards. The novel scoring system offers opportunities to motivate improvement and reduce variation in palliative care integration.

The Modified Early Warning Score: A Useful Marker of Neurological Worsening but Unreliable Predictor of Sepsis in the Neurocritically Ill-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

To determine the performance of the Modified Early Warning Score and Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score to predict sepsis, morbidity, and mortality in neurocritically ill patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients admitted to the neuro-ICU from January 2013 to December 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Observational study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline and clinical characteristics, infections/sepsis, neurologic worsening, and mortality were abstracted. Primary outcomes included new infection/sepsis, escalation of care, and mortality. Patients with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score/Modified Early Warning Score greater than or equal to 5 were compared with those with scores less than 5. 5. Of 7,286 patients, Of 7,286 patients, 1,120 had Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score greater than or equal to 5. Of those, mean age was 58.9 years; 50.2% were male. Inhospitality mortality was 22.1% for patients (248/1,120) with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score greater than or equal to 5, compared with 6.1% (379/6,166) with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score less than 5. Sepsis was present in 5.6% (345/6,166) when Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score less than 5 versus 14.3% (160/1,120) when greater than or equal to 5, and Modified Early Warning Score elevation led to a new sepsis diagnosis in 5.5% (62/1,120). Three-hundred forty-three patients (30.6%) had neurologic worsening at the time of Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score elevation. Utilizing the original Modified Early Warning Score, results were similar, with less score thresholds met (836/7,286) and slightly weaker associations. CONCLUSIONS: In neurocritical ill patients, Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score and Modified Early Warning Score are associated with higher inhospital mortality and are preferentially triggered in setting of neurologic worsening. They are less reliable in identifying new infection or sepsis in this patient population. Population-specific adjustment of early warning scores may be necessary for the neurocritically ill patient population.

Using Intern-Led Quality Improvement to Reduce Readmissions for Specialty Service Patients Within an Academic Medical Center.

Introduction: Postdischarge patient calls are an effective intervention to decrease unplanned readmissions. Despite its efficacy, calls are time consuming and compete with other clinical obligations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability of intern-led quality improvement (QI) on conducting initial postdischarge calls to filter patients who require clinical or nurse follow-up. Methods: QI interns from an academic medical center's QI program completed postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of patient discharge from a neurosurgery service between June 2018 and July 2019. QI interns filtered patients who required follow-up calls from a clinical service or nurse department. The departments called patients within 48 hours of requests. Unplanned readmission rate was compared between the cohort of patients who requested and received a follow-up call versus a cohort of patients who requested and did not receive a follow-up call (control). Results: QI interns completed 83.8% postdischarge patient calls within 72 hours of discharge. Reasons for unsuccessful calls included patient unresponsiveness (74.6%), wrong phone number on file (13.9%), and request to be called at a different time (11.5%). Nurses completed 57.2% follow-up requests within the targeted 48 hours and completed remaining requests within 7 days. QI intern postdischarge follow-up calls, in conjunction with nurse follow-up intervention, showed a significant (risk ratio = -3.31, p = 0.012) preventive effect on unplanned readmission rate. Conclusions: QI interns are a viable alternative to nurses to conduct the first contact of postdischarge patient follow-up calls. This system of QI interns filtering calls to the correct clinical service or nurse department increased postdischarge patient follow-up calls success rate and decreased readmission rates.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) in the NeuroICU: Identification of Risk Factors and Time-to-CAUTI Using a Case-Control Design.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for 25% of all hospital-acquired infections. Neuro-critically ill patients are at 2-5 times greater risk of developing CAUTI because of increased use of indwelling urinary catheters due to neurogenic urinary retention. Despite the heightened risk of CAUTI occurrence for the neuro-critically ill, there is little data on specific characteristics of CAUTIs and risk factors among this population. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics and risk factors associated with CAUTI development in the neuro-critical patient population. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center case-control study in a tertiary care dedicated 30-bed neuroICU, approximately 3 controls (exact ratio-3.2) were randomly selected for each CAUTI case between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2018. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, including prospectively collected data pertaining to urinary and bowel function. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify common patient characteristics, CAUTI risk factors and duration from catheterization to developing a CAUTI (Time-to-CAUTI). RESULTS: Of 3045 admissions during the study period, 1045 (34.30%) had a urinary catheter at some point during their admission. Of those, 45 developed a CAUTI, yielding a CAUTI incidence rate of 1.50%, corresponding to 4.49 infections/1000 catheter days. On average, CAUTI patients were older as compared to controls (66.44 years of age vs 58.09 years; p < 0.0001). In addition to old age, other risk factors included female gender (75.60% female vs 24.20% males in case group, p < 0.0001), increased neuroICU length of stay (18.31 in cases vs. 8.05 days in controls, p = 0.0001) and stool incontinence (OR = 3.73, p = 0.0146). CAUTI patients more often carried a primary diagnosis of SAH, and comorbidities of hypertension (HTN), vasospasm and diabetes. Time-to-CAUTI was 6 days on average, with an earlier peak for patients requiring two or more catheter placements. Presence of stool incontinence was significantly associated with CAUTI occurrence. CONCLUSION: Stool incontinence, older age, female sex, longer neuroICU LOS and presence of comorbidities such as HTN and diabetes were associated with CAUTI development in the neuro-critically ill population. Average Time-to-CAUTI after catheter placement was 6 days with earlier occurrence if more frequent catheterizations. Colonization of urinary catheters without infection might contribute to CAUTI diagnosis. Prospective research is needed to determine impact of prevention protocols incorporating these factors.

The Economic and Clinical Impact of Sustained Use of a Progressive Mobility Program in a Neuro-ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a progressive mobility program in a neurocritical care population with the hypothesis that the benefits and outcomes of the program (e.g., decreased length of stay) would have a significant positive economic impact. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of economic and clinical outcome data before, immediately following, and 2 years after implementation of the Progressive Upright Mobility Protocol Plus program (UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL) involving a series of planned movements in a sequential manner with an additional six levels of rehabilitation in the neuro-ICU at UF Health Shands Hospital. SETTING: Thirty-bed neuro-ICU in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult neurologic and neurosurgical patients: 1,118 patients in the pre period, 731 patients in the post period, and 796 patients in the sustained period. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of Progressive Upright Mobility Protocol Plus. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICU length of stay decreased from 6.5 to 5.8 days in the immediate post period and 5.9 days in the sustained period (F(2,2641) = 3.1; p = 0.045). Hospital length of stay was reduced from 11.3 ± 14.1 days to 8.6 ± 8.8 post days and 8.8 ± 9.3 days sustained (F(2,2641) = 13.0; p < 0.001). The impact of the study intervention on ICU length of stay (p = 0.031) and hospital length of stay (p < 0.001) remained after adjustment for age, sex, diagnoses, sedation, and ventilation. Hospital-acquired infections were reduced by 50%. Average total cost per patient after adjusting for inflation was significantly reduced by 16% (post period) and 11% (sustained period) when compared with preintervention (F(2,2641) = 3.1; p = 0.045). Overall, these differences translated to an approximately $12.0 million reduction in direct costs from February 2011 through the end of 2013. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing progressive mobility program in the neurocritical care population has clinical and financial benefits associated with its implementation and should be considered.

Prospective quality initiative to maximize dysphagia screening reduces hospital-acquired pneumonia prevalence in patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dysphagia can lead to pneumonia and subsequent death after acute stroke. However, no prospective study has demonstrated reduced pneumonia prevalence after implementation of a dysphagia screen. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective interrupted time series trial of a quality initiative to improve dysphagia screening. Subjects included all patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke admitted to our institution over 42 months with a 31-month (n=1686) preintervention and an 11-month (n=648) postintervention period. The intervention consisted of a dysphagia protocol with a nurse-administered bedside dysphagia screen and a reflexive rapid clinical swallow evaluation by a speech pathologist. RESULTS: The dysphagia initiative increased the percentage of patients with stroke screened from 39.3% to 74.2% (P<0.001). Furthermore, this initiative coincided with a drop in hospital-acquired pneumonia from 6.5% to 2.8% among patients with stroke (P<0.001). Patients admitted postinitiative had 57% lower odds of pneumonia, after controlling for multiple confounds (odds ratio=0.43; confidence interval, 0.255-0.711; P=0.0011). The best predictors of pneumonia were stroke type (P<0.0001), oral intake status (P<0.0001), dysphagia screening status (P=0.0037), and hospitalization before the beginning of the quality improvement initiative (P=0.0449). CONCLUSIONS: A quality improvement initiative using a nurse-administered bedside screen with rapid bedside swallow evaluation by a speech pathologist improves screening compliance and correlates with decreased prevalence of pneumonia among patients with stroke.

The effect of increased mobility on morbidity in the neurointensive care unit.

OBJECT: The detrimental effects of immobility on intensive care unit (ICU) patients are well established. Limited studies involving medical ICUs have demonstrated the safety and benefit of mobility protocols. Currently no study has investigated the role of increased mobility in the neurointensive care unit population. This study was a single-institution prospective intervention trial to investigate the effectiveness of increased mobility among neurointensive care unit patients. METHODS: All patients admitted to the neurointensive care unit of a tertiary care center over a 16-month period (April 2010 through July 2011) were evaluated. The study consisted of a 10-month (8025 patient days) preintervention observation period followed by a 6-month (4455 patient days) postintervention period. The intervention was a comprehensive mobility initiative utilizing the Progressive Upright Mobility Protocol (PUMP) Plus. RESULTS: Implementation of the PUMP Plus increased mobility among neurointensive care unit patients by 300% (p < 0.0001). Initiation of this protocol also correlated with a reduction in neurointensive care unit length of stay (LOS; p < 0.004), hospital LOS (p < 0.004), hospital-acquired infections (p < 0.05), and ventilator-associated pneumonias (p < 0.001), and decreased the number of patient days in restraints (p < 0.05). Additionally, increased mobility did not lead to increases in adverse events as measured by falls or inadvertent line disconnections. CONCLUSIONS: Among neurointensive care unit patients, increased mobility can be achieved quickly and safely with associated reductions in LOS and hospital-acquired infections using the PUMP Plus program.

Reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institution's success.

OBJECT: To date, there has been a shortage of evidence-based quality improvement initiatives that have shown positive outcomes in the neurosurgical patient population. A single-institution prospective intervention trial with continuous feedback was conducted to investigate the implementation of a urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention bundle to decrease the catheter-associated UTI rate. METHODS: All patients admitted to the adult neurological intensive care unit (neuro ICU) during a 30-month period were included. The study consisted of two 1-month preintervention observation periods (approximately 1200 catheter days) followed by a 30-month intervention phase (20,394 catheter days). A comprehensive evidence-based UTI bundle encompassing avoidance of catheter insertion, maintenance of sterility, product standardization, and early catheter removal was enacted. RESULTS: The urinary catheter utilization rate dropped from 100% to 73.3% during the intervention phase (p < 0.0001) without any increase in the rate of sacral decubitus ulcers or other skin breakdown. The rate of catheter-associated UTI was also significantly reduced from 13.3 to 4.0 infections per 1000 catheter days (p < 0.001). There was a linear relationship between the decreased quarterly catheter utilization rate and the decreased catheter-associated UTI rate (r(2) = 0.79, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This single-center prospective study demonstrated that a comprehensive UTI prevention bundle along with a continuous quality improvement program can significantly reduce the duration of urinary catheterization and rate of catheter-associated UTI in a neuro ICU.